From some of your responses to my recent article about the Subaru Stella on show in Melbourne, I guessed that you may think I'm the usual middle-aged car-nut. Apparently, I hate the environment, and electric cars. Clearly, these people can't read.

As I said in that article, I love electric cars. Not ones like the Subaru Stella, though. I prefer ones that actually are a significant step toward sustainable and environmentally friendly motoring. Like this Mitsubishi iMiEV. And guess what? It's coming to a showroom near you. This is the good parts you need to know:

The Mitsubishi iMiEV may only have a 47kW motor, but with 180Nm it will have impressive acceleration, and it has a healthy top speed of 130kmh. If you don't believe that those figures are enough to provide "normal" acceleration, you only need to consider that the iMiEV weighs just over a tonne - 1080kg. It's plenty, trust me. Power comes from Lithium-ion batteries, and can give the iMiEV a range of 160km, which is more than enough for most daily commutes, or your lazy Sunday drive. Recharging the batteries at the end of the day takes between 7-14 hours from flat to fully charged, depending on your power source. That may sound like a lot, but most of the time, it won't take that long to fully charge it, because it won't be fully flat to start with, if you know what I mean. Putting it on charge overnight will do just fine.

So what are the downsides, assuming there are any? Yes, there are, but crucially, as I would like to point out, they are not as significant as they are with the Stella. Like the Stella, the iMiEV is expensive. At $30,000, it may be a seriously hefty price premium for a car that is only 3.4 metres long (a whole half a metre shorter than the Colt, which isn't a huge car to start with), but nevertheless, I must commend the iMiEV for putting environmentally friendly motoring within the financial reach of a lot of people. Not everyone, admittedly, and a car this small may not be practical for some people, but the iMiEV is highly space-efficient, since it is an electric adaptation of the hugely successful Mitsubishi i (which sadly isn't sold here).

Yes, it does have some limitations, but the Mitsubishi iMiEV is a huge step in the right direction, and one that is useable for an average Joe like me, everyday. That's a win-win. I can only hope that the Australian public take to it warmly, which will encourage other car makers to bring their new, high-tech electric cars to Australia.

MELBOURNE 2009: Mitsubishi iMiEV is Electrifying

Ahead of it's official launch at the Geneva Motor Show, Hyundai has released preliminary pictures of the ix-onic Concept, which will become the Hyundai ix35 at the Frankfurt Motor Show later this year, which will effectively replace today's Hyundai Tucson. Hope that all wasn't too confusing. At only 4.4 metres long, this new ix-onic concept proves that 4x4 cars don't need to be big and bulky to look cool - it will enter a market segment populated already by the Nissan Dualis, but will also head off the upcoming Peugeot 3008. If this concept is anything to go by, the Koreans will make a car that is sexier than both of them put together.

Obviously, the ix35 isn't quite going to look as good as this concept. But, as we've seen from the new i20, Hyundai are increasingly making cars that look as good as the best in the business. And if there's one thing I know, it's that style is the number one factor in getting people into showrooms. I swear it's 100% true.

This concept has a very attractive 1.6 Litre turbocharged petrol engine, which is likely to go to production on the ix35. This is wonderful news indeed, since this engine will pump out 125 kilowatts of power while emitting less CO2 than any of it's 4x4 competitors (149 g/km). That's something I like to hear.

GENEVA 2009: Hyundai ix-onic Will Become ix35 Tucson Replacement

As regular readers of IYF! will know, I'm a huge fan of the Fiat 500. It is one of a rare breed of cars that makes the driver feel absurdly special, is cute but not puke-worthy, and is a good representation of retro cool. What I love most, however is the attention to detail. Read my post How to do Retro Tastefully for more information on this stunning car. It even won my Really Cool Fashion Accessory Award for 2008.

But this attention to detail is completely missing in the new 500C. It's just a convertible version of the 500, but I'm missing the point of it. Why did they leave the sides intact when the fabric roof lifts off? It means that the fresh air isn't all around you, but just above you, where you won't feel it or see it, and the roof just ends up sitting on the back of the car, all crumpled up and disgusting. This is not stylish, this is just dumb. I would rather get a regular 500 with the panoramic sunroof - at least that way I'd have a normal looking car that didn't have a spastic coloured roof.

NEWS: Fiat 500C Has Questionable Appeal

It was time for my sister to buy her first car, and with my advice in mind, to cut a long story short I should just tell you that she ended up buying a Hyundai i30. Today, actually. So I thought I'd share with you the way she arrived at her choice, because I believe that the way she went about buying her first car was exemplary to say the least.

To start off, we discussed her size range - one of the single most important things to consider when buying a car, and most often overlooked. It is a great starting place, and also gives you a consequential price range. My sister is a percussionist, and is often carrying a reasonable amount of gear, if not necessarily a lot of passengers. So a large cargo room area (with seats folded down) was needed, but a wagon was deemed too big. Instead, a large hatchback seemed the go, especially with the high amount of city driving that she plans to do. So immediately, she found that she had a list of cars to investigate.

However, there were a few priorities that influenced this list. She did not want safety to be at all compromised - so her car had to feature the full set of airbags (front, side and curtain) and feature electronic stability control. To obtain these features in a used car is next to impossible, and she found that it involved buying a reasonably old car from a premium brand such as Audi. The trouble then was that such premium cars incur extra costs, namely insurance, premium grade fuel, parts prices, service and repair costs. With the cost of ownership stacking up on cars that were already more than 5 years old, she decided that it simply wasn't worth it. With about $25,000 to spend (she had saved for a good number of years!) she decided that the best course of action was to buy a new car, and fit the safety features as options where they weren't standard. So a list was created, and we prepared to eliminate those who were unworthy.

The cars on this list were extensively researched on the internet, and the findings written down in a notebook for easy reference later. Each page was devoted to a different car, and when compared, all the pros and cons of each car were evident. So my sister stayed true to my golden rule number 9: "Do ya bloody research, ya lazy bugger!" - although that article "Your First Car" is geared (forgive the pun) toward buyers looking at a used car, you can read my buying tips here. Anyway, it was clear that some cars would have to be rejected before the race started, for the various reasons stated below:

Citroen C4 SX - too expensive, especially with automatic transmission
Fiat Ritmo Dynamic - automatic transmission not available (...!), expensive too
Ford Focus CL
Holden Astra CD - curtain airbags not available on "CD" model, no stability control
Honda Civic VTi - not a hatchback, lacks stability control, only front airbags available
Hyundai i30 SX
Mazda3 Neo Sport
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback CL - no stability control, automatic is $2,500 extra!
Nissan Tiida ST-L - no stability control, not roomy enough
Peugeot 308 XS - too expensive, no automatic on XS model
Renault Megane Dynamique - Expensive, not practical enough
Subaru Impreza R - Expensive, again
Suzuki SX-4 - no stability control, only two airbags, high fuel consumption
Toyota Corolla Seca Ascent - no stability control at all
Volkswagen Golf Edition - wait for it... too expensive also

As it turns out, after all that, there were only three cars that fulfilled her needs at all, even if it was only on paper. And if you remember my "Your First Car" feature story, I had a golden rule - forget about Chrylser, Daewoo, Daihatsu, Dodge, Hummer, Hyundai, Kia, Proton and Ssangyong. Technically, this should have ruled out the i30, but my argument for this rule in the first place were that these brands make unsafe and poor quality cars. The i30 had all the safety features she wanted, providing she optioned the safety pack, and a new Hyundai will have a 5-year warranty. It's seemed churlish to deny it a spot in the final three.

So, having done all her research, she went dealing, and found that she really could just rule the Focus out of contention. Sometimes things aren't as good as they seem to be on paper. The Focus was essentially just as good as the Mazda3, without the sporty attitude and cool looks. The Focus also lacked a few convenience features that the Mazda had, and in the end, the after-bargaining price was pretty much the same.

The i30 however, is the one that came on top of the Mazda - for a few reasons, actually. Believe it or not, the i30 had the better interior. No, really. The interior pictures I have here are merely for illustration, and have been nicked from www.carsales.com, and aren't the actually the cars she looked at. But they are the right models, Neo Sport (Mazda) and SX (Hyundai), although I understand it may be hard to see what I mean from just the pictures. There were a few things about the Mazda that were simply done better in the i30. For example, the instrumentation of the i30, with its blue lighting, is much clearer than the Mazda3 and its eye-hating red illumination. Actually, the speedometer of the Mazda3 Neo Sport is the biggest problem, because 0-100kmh occurs in the 6 to 9 o'clock positions of the dial, and such a small spread of numbers makes your speed difficult to gauge (I'm loving these puns today!). This is no such problem in the i30. In fact, the i30 interior was obviously cleaner and just as classy as the Mazda, which does not appropriately reflect the pictures to the right. Even the rear seat provides more legroom and kneeroom, while boot space for either car is virtually the same.

Where the Mazda should gain ground on the i30, in driving experience, it fails, because the difference was not enough to gain the attention of my sister, who felt that they both drove very well and was content with either, although she preferred the driving position of the i30. This underscores the importance of test-driving these cars - even my sister was going to assume that because the i30 was a Hyundai it would be incompetent on the road. The i30 even has a few extra features over the Mazda, the most useful of which is a burglar alarm.

Don't get me wrong, we're both huge fans of the Mazda3, and still are, but at the time she was car buying, the Mazda was a car at the end of it's model cycle, and significantly older in design than the i30 - it showed. Which proves a point in my "Your First Car" article - cars are getting better all the time. Although the Mazda is obviously cooler than the rather bland Hyundai, this did not bother my sister at all - the Hyundai was by no means boring, she argued, and was better in just about every other area of assessment.

In fact, even I have been converted to an i30 fan - I'm not a huge fan of the way it looks, but for most people, it looks absolutely fine, drives absolutely fine, and is great value. She haggled like her life depended on it, and came away with a great deal. The real way to describe the i30 would be with this sentence: "There is absolutely nothing wrong with the i30, other than it has an awful Hyundai badge on the bonnet and tailgate."

But if that doesn't bother you, like it didn't for my sister, then the i30 is a great car. More importantly, it's a car that you can love. And she certainly loves her red Hyundai i30 - she's going to show it off to her friends.

FEATURE STORY: My Sister Bought an i30... Shock!

When Mitsubishi made the current Outlander, both Citroen and Peugeot were involved, and so, it was announced that they would be making their own versions of the Outlander platform. The Citroen C-Crosser was quietly released in 2007 - I say quietly because aside from the more Citroen-esque nose, the shape of the car was pure Outlander. Even the interior was identical to the Mitsubishi. Peugeot then released the 4007, which again, was virtually identical, except for the face. So don't say anything about the Mitsubishi Outlander in front of people that work for Peugeot or Citroen. And no-one's really buying the C-Crosser or 4007 because we can all see through their lies - they're not new cars in their own right, merely copies. So Peugeot didn't want that to happen again with their latest attempt at a Compact SUV. It is all new, based on the 308 platform, and got an extra 0 to its name.

Actually, I'm reasonably impressed by the 3008. The overall shape of the car is quite pleasing, if a bit bulky and chubby. Of course, because this is a Peugeot, the face of the car is horrible - how hard can it be to make a car with a nice nose? Oh, wait a minute, I forgot - the French have no inspiration for nice noses. The domestic trend is quite the opposite. On the other hand, because this is a Peugeot, it will look much better in real life than it does in pictures. Hopefully. Well, I hated the 407 in pictures, but when I see them out on the road, they somehow look elegant. This had baffled me for a long time, until I realised the truth - Peugeot have invested a lot of money in the paint finish of their cars. Have you ever seen a 407 with a boring looking paintjob? They're always sparkly and stunning, or glossy and classy. Perhaps this is what is blinding me to the true ugliness of a Peugeot.

Anyway, the 3008. In Europe, the 3008 will be offered in a vast range of petrol and diesel engines, but when it arrives here in 2010, the story will be a bit different. The petrol range of the 3008 only reaches 1.6 Litres and 115kw, so it is most likely that we'll only get the top-of-the-range 2.0Litre diesel engine, producing 120kW and 340Nm. In 2011, Peugeot plan to introduce a diesel-electric 3008, like the Prologue HYbrid4 concept shown last year. Don't expect that to come here though, sadly.

The new 3008 will be offered in 5-seat and 7-seat configurations, and Peugeot want the 3008 to fill the roles of SUV, people mover, and family hatchback. I personally think it will join the Nissan Dualis in a new market segment - a sort of 4x4, sort of hatchback kind of car. Perhaps then it would be a good idea to create a front wheel drive version of the 3008, Peugeot? In this way, the 3008 will save weight (increasing performance, economy, etc.) and hopefully also make some gains in the handling department. It's not like people who want a 3008 will want to go off-road, by any stretch of the imagination.

Like when they launched the 308, Peugeot are harping incessantly on about how their new cars are of vastly better quality. And though I'll admit that the interior looks pleasant, in an Audi R8 kind of way, time will be the judge of their claims. Wouldn't it be great if other car makers could make their more interesting cars as reliable as a Toyota?

But do you think that Peugeot really is purposely entering their car in a new market segment? Does the 3008 really compete with the Nissan Dualis? You know what I'm talking about when you see them next to each other. They both share the same low ride height, anyway. Let me know whether you think the concept will take off - I believe, providing the price is right, that it will.

NEWS: Peugeot 3008 Officially Launched into a New Market Segment

I like the Mitsubishi Lancer - it's a car that is pretty much at the top of it's game, up with the class competitors, and selling well. It's exactly the thing Mitsubishi Australia needed to increase profitability in our market. Then they introduced the Sportback.

In one rather memorable story, I remarked that you're usually pretty safe with any small car that has the word "Sport" added to it. I was pretty much right, but only because in that case, the "sport" referred to a level of specification (tuned suspension, bodykit, etc.), and not the rear end of a car. It's becoming a growing trend. Audi named the four-door version of their A3 the "Sportback", then Holden decided that the new Commodore wagon should be called "Sportwagon" (what the frick is sporty about a 5-metre long Commodore Omega wagon has got me beat), and now we have the Lancer Sportback. The reason why I'm really annoyed by the Lancer is because, unlike the Audi and the Commodore, it looks absolutely hideous.

I couldn't find a picture on the internet that hadn't been cleverly angled to hide the wierd shape of that rear hatchback - it looks pretty unloved, doesn't it? Nevertheless, I will assume that it broadens the Lancer's appeal further, and can probably carry heaps of stuff. Why I'm really mentioning it is because usually, the transfer from hatch to booted sedan comes up with some hideous cars. Think about when they made the Toyota Echo sedan! That was a shocker. Thankfully, car makers have realised that we tend not to buy ugly spin-offs of good cars, so we don't get some of these hatch-to-sedan blunders. Elsewhere however, they have. Often, these are travesties that are best represented in profile - the Citroen C4 sedan. Nowhere near funky enough to be a dancing robot (tell Tsoukinator). Another example I'd like to show you is the Mazda2 Sedan - horrible!

I want to have a dig at it not because I think it is ugly (even though I do think so) - Imprezas, and Subaru's in general, are meant to be ugly. It's reassuring. It tells you: "Don't worry. I haven't changed. I'm still ugly - I'm still good quality Subaru inside." Instead, I hate it because in profile, or side-view, it has basically copied the proportions of the current (and outgoing) Mazda3. Tut, tut, tut.

Alright, now it's the sedan's turn. The front half of the car is actually bearable, but only once you've seen the rear end. Subaru have done even more copycating here - although this time, they've copycatted something really bad to start with.

What would you think if I told you that you're new "fooli sik" WRX looked like a Suzuki SX4? Well, I'd be right, and you'd be fuming - "how dare you compare my fooli sik WRX with that heap of sh**!" you will say. But I will walk away and laugh, because the arse of your $50,000 sports car, with rally credentials, street savvy, and a youthful image - looks identical to the arse of your grandma's little runaround.

RANT: I Don't Like That Arse, I Don't...

We had teaser pictures for the sedan - and now we have the hatch. And the pictures are even less revealing. Basically, other than the rear hatchback, it is identical to the sedan, which is interesting, because the previous generation hatch and sedan were similar looking, but not at all the same. I suppose it makes better business sense for Mazda this way - I guess it's not really that much of a big deal. The bumper sticks out heaps, like the sedan, but this could just be a product of the angles these pictures were taken on - I now have new, better pictures of the Mazda3 sedan which indicate that it's a better proportioned car than I had originally anticipated.
I now also know that the red hatch I showed you in the previous Mazda3 story was an absolute crock - it looks nothing like the real thing.

I maintain that the bonnet and grille still look like a Peugeot 308 (sadly this face, which has been previewed on some of Mazda's concepts, will become the face of all in the Mazda family), but I'm sure that the next generation Mazda3 will be far more stylish than it's predecessor, which was hardly dorky. I have also now have pictures of the interior, seen here in what I assume is SP25 guise (the 2.3 litre engine will be upgraded to a 2.5 like the Mazda6) and the general layout looks just like the Mazda6 really. Sadly, no RX-8 style wheel this time. But this car does seem to have more steering wheel buttons than I have ever seen in my life, which begs the question: what are they all for? And more importantly, aren't we all going to be spending heaps of time looking for which button to press (and averting our eyes from the road)? I thought steering wheel controls where meant to remove distraction. Can't see what I'm talking about? Click on the interior picture for the larger image.

NEWS: Mazda3 2010 update

It won't be long before the Hyundai Getz, well... getz the flick. The all new i20 is set to follow in it's bigger brother's footsteps (the i30), and offer a real alternative to the Mazda2 and Honda Jazz - and, knowing what the Koreans are like, it will be cheaper than just about all its rivals. Except maybe Kia.

The i20, despite what what Hyundai will protest, doesn't look remotely European - neither did the i30, and they reckoned that looked European too (it had chrome accents in the wheels, for Pete's sake! Bleugh!). Not to say that the i20 looks yuck, because it's more successful than the i30 at looking funky, modern and appealing. There's something of a Smart ForFour about it in my eyes, but with an asian-flavoured tilt. It could be another sign that Hyundai is becoming a whole lot more competitive. Not that I'd want one - it's a Hyundai, after all. How could I possibly put up with the shame?

NEWS: Hyundai i20 to replace Getz

Well, Mazda has decided that the aging (but still great looking) Mazda3 needs a new model. So they leaked out some teaser images. As usual, these teaser images are taken from not-so-revealing angles, so that you don't really get much of an idea of how the car will look in real life.

Unfortunately, this looks like one contrived car, particularly at the rear, which poses the question - why did Mazda decide that two of these three pictures should showcase the back? It's hard to tell what the front looks like at all. The rear tail-lights mimic the new Mazda6, but seem far too big, and wrap around the sides too far, and the car itself generally looks big-bottomed because of the squared off boot, and large bumper - surely you don't need a bumper that sticks out that much? It may be for safety, but it weighs the rear down even more than that squared off boot does - what's it for then, sitting on? The side windows sort of just, finish - without a bit of smoothness, which is odd, considering the rest of the car has been redesigned to look smoother than the previous model.

But enough whinging. The new Mazda3 sedan will be unveiled at the Los Angeles Motor Show on November 19, and will be billed as the "next generation of Zoom-Zoom spirit". Yeah, whatever. No word on when the hatch will be unveiled, though - and I was always a far bigger fan of the hatch too, damn! No really, I was, I'm keep telling my sister to buy one for her first car, I like it that much.

A long search for the hatch yielded only this unverified picture (left), which considering we now know what the sedan looks like, could be almost right: Yes, I know the front doesn't look the same, but I think the general shape is right here. It hopefully won't look quite as conservative as this, but it's an agreeable design nonetheless.

I noticed something though: check out this Peugeot 308 on the right, and then the face of the Mazda3 Sedan at the very top. Now do you understand where you thought you'd seen this face before? It's nearly identical. That's the way the motor industry works, and has for donkey's yonks - everyone copies each other. What a shame Mazda didn't copy something cooler, like it's Furai concept - google it, it's fully sick. Especially with the lights all on!

NEWS: Mazda 3 2010 Teaser Photos